Katarina Löfström

Emet Brulin

Abstract cuts

Emet Brulin

 

Much can be done with scissors and abstraction. Coloured fields and parallelograms

displacing each other, forming chains and arrows, expanding as they shrink. In

Katarina Löfström’s video work The Elements (2025), a simple image unravels into its

constituent parts. Her work is that of dismantling and reassembling. A backward step

from the order in which everyday perception lulls us. In other words, a way of

breaking down and understanding a taken-for-granted whole.

 

Löfström takes hold of, cuts, and purifies Karin Larsson’s tapestry The Four Elements

to its smallest geometric denominator. She, Karin, stands on the right in her

husband Carl Larsson’s painting Azalea (1906), body facing out and away from the

painting, neck bent diagonally backwards; hidden behind a large azalea, she looks

towards the painter. That is, towards you. Karin has scissors in her hand. On the left,

the everyday scene is interrupted by small rectangular and vertically wave-shaped

fields of colour in a loom – the beginning of the tapestry The Four Elements. An

opening, that is, in the canvas where the weave of perception can be unbraided.

 

Is some underlying truth reviled here? That is not the point. But by cutting and

refining, abstracting, removing from the order of perception, that which we do not

see that we see through, the continuous flow of perception is broken. Stories twist

around themselves and collapse. A kind of code emerges that belongs neither to

any scene with Karin Larsson, you or me at the kitchen table, nor to the primordial

sound or image of the nation. It is not a striving for resemblance to such a scene.

The code is this: to take apart and put together, and the utmost pleasure that comes

from abstracting and modulating the given. A reminder of the fact that what we

perceive is contingent.

 

Narcissus’ lament – I cannot escape – is a cry that testifies to the opposite: the given

is not contingent, not possible to change, take apart or to escape. The very image of

Narcissus is all too dear to him. Katarina Löfström lets the lament echo. Reinforces

and breaks down this dreadful lock into banal code. Dots and dashes. Long and

short flashes. A representation, yes, but above all a new expression that enables an

opening in the ego’s hermetic relationship with itself, the nation's romanticisation of

its sound. When the absurdity of the lock is formalised and taken to its extreme,

then one can only laugh at its banality. Such is the power of abstraction; the given is

not given.

 

Entering the gallery space and surrounding oneself with fields of colour on the walls

and floor and The Elements’ electronic sounds which contrasts with the fiddles is to

decipher abstraction for oneself and how it relates to everyday expressions. The

code points back to the viewers themselves – it is up to you, do with it what you can.

If Karin Larsson’s tapestry and Narcissus’ lament are puzzle pieces and emblems of

our time, Löfström offers an exercise: do not attach yourself to what perception

gives, accentuate the given detail and bring the reinforced element together with an

unexpected other. Taking apart requires more order, more systematics, than putting

together. Löfström’s room and work are thus a much-needed call to, with equal

parts playfulness and seriousness, find the openings in and modulate reality.

 

Emet Brulin is a critic and doctoral candidate in aesthetics.